Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Steven Work's avatar

A co-worker that became a friend was a core-man in Vietnam and it really screwed him up. He was still dealing with it [sometimes badly] 30+ years later. He could never talk about it directly but from the bits and pieces I am sure that he was ordered to kill squad-mates when they were suffering and going to die before he could get to medical help competent enough to save him, or perhaps the mission was judged to important to risk or end because of those injured? For whatever reason, he was ordered to kill [likely] friends. "Coreman, do your duty!"

When I was a young man I'm sure that would and f-ed me a bit to a lot. As a 61 yo sufferer of life and of evil, I'm sure I could do it and not be shaken too much.

In fact, after a parking lot fight I tried to avoid, and then nearly kill the man, scared the crap out of me and made 'Die without killing anyone' my top Bucket-list entry. It's been 40+ years of finger-crossed I am pleased to be much closer to death, and God Willing - anytime would be fine as long as I'm good with Him.

--

As a lawyer perhaps your perspective can help me.

Since I watched one of Jorden Petersons earlier lectures where he talked about 5-main personality traits and children poorly socialized and how they overlap into a type of violent sociopath that is [Sadly] best handled by prison until later 20's or early 30's when they start to mellow - I suppose I can phrase it that way.

I strongly believe that any prison term longer the 6 months damages the criminal and his society and family and in general us all, in complicitness is wasting his/her potential gifts to themselves and others. Yet, what is the alternative?

The best I could think of is that I would prefer and could benefit from working in a logging camp or similar isolated (from regular society) yet working with peers under some mentoring firm leadership, bootcamp like.

Yet could men (people) so explosive and violent do that without being a risk to self and others?

Other suggestions? This came up as I considered the comment about overly 'soft' Judges and repeat violent criminals and their victims.

God Bless., Steve

Expand full comment
Ellis Reyes's avatar

A well told vignette.

Question: Do judges have any liability for consistently releasing convicted criminals with violent criminal histories who go on to reoffend? What if they are activist judges who have written voluminously about their intention to rectify the wrongs of the past through lenient sentencing. I know that they have broad discretion, but are there any ethical or statutory limits?

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts